Another twist and turn in the increasingly spiteful “divorce” proceedings between Chelsea and their former centre back, Arsenal man William Gallas, and it looks like this one could be annoying us all from the back pages for a while yet.
Chelsea, now infamously, released a statement early in the week alledging that Gallas had threatened to concede own goals, make deliberate mistakes and get himself sent off if selected for Chelsea, both towards the end of last season, over preseason and in the opening games of this season. Chelsea further claimed that the player was simply trying to engineer a big money move away from the club which had lifted him to his current exalted position as a top world player and Premiership double champion and went public with the allegations to show their fans why he was sold.
Gallas has, of course, denied that he made such threats and is ready now to mount a legal battle to clear his name and show Chelsea up for the bully boy kings of spin that they really are. He’s even roped his dad into some press interviews to say that his boy never would have said those things:
“I know my son through and through - and he is totally incapable of doing any of the things Chelsea say.
“I am a father who likes to stay in the background and let William do his own talking when he has to.
“But, when it comes to an attack on his honour and that of the family, like this, I can talk of my belief in him.
“I have already spoken to William about what Chelsea are saying about him. But I am not worried for him. He is a man who can stand up for himself.”
The whole episode just further drags the game’s name through the mud and it’s no surprise to see Chelsea at the forefront of it all. Their heavy handed approach to “outing” Gallas backfired as a PR stunt and I’m sure there are a few red faces at the club surrounding the main protagonists who clamoured for the statement’s release.
If it was Jose Mourinho then in what light does it show the increasingly under pressure “Special One” and his man-management skills? If it was Peter Kenyon then does it not further highlight the man’s complete inability to follow any morally righteous path inthe execution of his duties and if it was neither of those two, just who is speaking for Chelsea Football Club these days?
I think we all demand some honest answers.